Composite rectangular loop - blocked out U2's

More
5 months 3 weeks ago - 5 months 1 week ago #318 by anne_chanly
Clinical Discussion - May 2023:
Records: April 13, 2023

15 years old, Hispanic female.
  • Presented with a chief complaint of poorly aligned teeth, she is especially concerned about the position of upper lateral incisors
  • We treatment planned a non-extraction comprehensive orthodontic treatment
  • Treatment plan
    • Step 1: TPA to expand U6s and derotate 
    • Step 2: Large rectangular loop U4s and 5s
      • Expand U4-5-6's, more of a rotation than expansion
      • U3's already buccal, so don't expand them
      • IPR also needed in area of U3s-U6's, ~1mm per side

          
Last edit: 5 months 1 week ago by anne_chanly.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Giorgio_Fiorelli

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 months 3 weeks ago #319 by Giorgio_Fiorelli
Ann, I think posting in this way is a great start! 
The images below are just to try the system myself.
 

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 months 3 weeks ago #322 by anne_chanly
Sounds good, I will continue posting and correcting this one. Thanks for your help. Anne =)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 months 1 week ago - 5 months 1 week ago #324 by anne_chanly
Clinical Discussion - Oct 2023:
Records: Sept 29, 2023
  • Findings since May 2023:
    • Expansion seen on L6's from LLA (0.36 TMA)
    • Expansion seen on U6's and U4-5's from HS arch (0.36 TMA) and large rectangular loops (17X25 TMA)
    • Some space creation seen for U2's, still insufficient amount to bring U2's into arch
  • Recommendations from Clinical discussion Oct 2023: Need to increase OJ and keep U1's forward, 2 options:
    • Option 1 - U-shaped vertical loop with notch b/t U1's
      • Extrusive component
      • Notch in loop prevents sliding
    • Option 2 - Using TPA (0.36") with 2 cantilevers, 70-80g per side to bring U1-1 forward and transversally
      • Transversal force will cancel each other out so that you only have forward movement
      • Remember to add extension to the segmental wire in order to allow for hook on cantilevers to travel distally over time
      • If extrusive component is not placed in vertical loop wire then vertical elastics can replace this force



Last edit: 5 months 1 week ago by anne_chanly.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 months 1 week ago - 5 months 1 week ago #325 by anne_chanly
Clinical Discussion - May 2024:
Records: May 4, 2024 

Findings;
  • Additional upper expansion seen on upper
  • Additional lower expansion and uprighting on lower
  • Additional space made for U2's
  • Expansion with Bite plate used to continue lower expansion and to keep patient of occlusion in order to allow U2's to have crossbite correction
Recommendations from Clinical Discussion May 2024 - Need to continue transversal expansion
  • Don't use power chain to bring U2's forward, it is less control of root movement
    • Use composite rectangular loop instead - Upper  2-1-1-2 (17X25 TMA and 18 TMA)
      • Framework from U3-3 with bypass of U2's
      • Vertical brackets on U2's (vertical slot)
  • IPR UL2
  • Correct rotation of LL4 with rectangular loop
  • Continue transversal expansion 
    • Take measurements: intermolar, premolar, and canine widths
  • Ck for need for IPR of lower anteriors
  • In the posterior, the U-shaped loop extension should be a step up instead of a step down in order to allow easier oral hygiene and less chance of occlusion interferences


 
 
Last edit: 5 months 1 week ago by anne_chanly.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 months 1 week ago #326 by anne_chanly
Clinical Discussion - Oct 2024
Records: Sept 9, 2024

Findings: 
  • Intrusion seen on U6s b/c side effect of U-loop was not prevented due to only having single tube on U6's bands
  • Improved crossbite of U2's
  • Improvement in in OJ

Clinical Discussion Recommendations: Correct intruded U6's, expand area of U3's, more torque needed for U2's
  • For the U-Loop design should change to have a loop in the center of the U for extrusion
    •  this centered loop is not needed for intrusion
  • Correct intrusion of U6's and mesial tip
    • Rigid extension from U6's and use vertical elastics to passive segment L4-5-6's
    • Prevent intrusion in the future by using a double tube on U6's bands, passive segments from UR4-5-6 and UL4-5-6 and passive segment LR4-5-6 and LL4-5-6 the use vertical elastics from U to L 4's on R/L
    • Expand in area of U3's in rectangular loop framework
    • Increasing torque on U2's will help decrease excessive gingival display
The following user(s) said Thank You: Giorgio_Fiorelli

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.244 seconds